Przy kontrolowaniu, ograniczaniu wszystkiego i wszystkich przez patoli i wtórujących im hitlerowców pokroju von der Leyen, wyjście z UE jest jedynym słusznym rozwiązaniem, no chyba że komuś odpowiada zostanie niewolnikiem psychopatów
Rzeczniczka Konfederacji zaskoczyła swoją bezpośredniością. Formacja Krzysztofa Bosaka i Sławomira Mentzena w ostatnim czasie złagodziła ton wobec Brukseli i trudno znaleźć głosy jawnie nawołujące do polexitu. Za taki z pewnością można uznać głos Ewy Zajączkowskiej Hernik, która wprost przyznała, że nadszedł czas na dyskusję o tym, czy warto pozostać we Wspólnocie. – Ludzie widzą co nam funduje Unia Europejska jeżeli chodzi o politykę klimatyczną, czy migracyjną. Jeżeli za pomocą referendum weszliśmy do UE, to za pomocą referendum powinniśmy też z tej Unii wyjść – mówiła w “Sednie Sprawy” działaczka Konfederacji.
Zajączkowska przyznaje, że dzisiaj ogromna większość społeczeństwa chce pozostać we Wspólnocie. Nie planuje jednak przejść nad tym obojętnie. – Dyskusję lepiej zacząć wcześniej niż później. Trzeba tłumaczyć Polakom, czym grozi nam pozostanie w Unii Europejskiej i do czego zmierza cała polityka UE i powolutku uświadamiać, że być może lepsze byłoby wyjście. Na pewno powinniśmy o tym rozmawiać, a jeżeli będzie zgoda społeczeństwa, Konfederacja jako najbardziej racjonalna partia, będzie za tym, żeby UE opuścić. Powinniśmy mieć jednak polityków, którzy dobrze wynegocjują nam polexit. Nie wyobrażam sobie, żeby te negocjacje prowadzili Donald Tusk, czy Jarosław Kaczyński – konkluduje gość “Sedna Sprawy”.
https://polityka.se.pl/wiadomosci/zaskakujace-slowa-rzeczniczki-konfederacji-o-wyjsciu-z-unii-trzeba-tlumaczyc-polakom-czym-grozi-pozostanie-w-ue-aa-3rKH-D4Zm-aBd3.html
Przy wychodzeniu z UE zostawiłbym też za drzwiami ideologię religijną, na której ruch patriotyczny stara się odbudowywać tożsamość RP, a która jest kompletną fikcją i która została stworzona przez schiozoidalnych kontrolerów z Rzymu jako odpowiedź na rosnące wpływy innej schizodalnej ideologii, ideologii żydowskiej:
A controversial American biblical scholar is set to make his first appearance in London next week to present a discovery that he claims proves the story of Jesus Christ was invented as a system of mind control to enslave the poor.
Joseph Atwill, who is the author of a book entitled ‘Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus’, asserts that Christianity did not begin as a religion, but was actually a sophisticated government propaganda exercise used to pacify the subjects of the Roman Empire.
At the ‘Covert Messiah’ conference, to be held at the Conway Hall in Holborn a week on Saturday, Mr Atwill will present his theory that the New Testament was written by first-century Roman aristocrats and that they entirely fabricated the story of Jesus Christ.
Outlining his ideas in a blog posting on his website Mr Atwill writes: “Christianity may be considered a religion, but it was actually developed and used as a system of mind control to produce slaves that believed God decreed their slavery.”
Mr Atwill says that acts of insurrection by Jewish sects, who were awaiting the arrival of a so-called ‘warrior Messiah’ in Palestine, were a perpetual problem for the Roman Empire and that after the Empire had exhausted all traditional means of dealing with the problem they resorted to psychological warfare.
“They surmised that the way to stop the spread of zealous Jewish missionary activity was to create a competing belief system,” Atwill told PRWeb.com
“That’s when the ‘peaceful’ Messiah story was invented.
“Instead of inspiring warfare, this Messiah urged turn-the-other-cheek pacifism and encouraged Jews to ‘give onto Caesar’ and pay their taxes to Rome.”
Mr Atwill continues: “Although Christianity can be a comfort to some, it can also be very damaging and repressive, an insidious form of mind control that has led to blind acceptance of serfdom, poverty, and war throughout history.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/story-of-jesus-christ-was-fabricated-to-pacify-the-poor-claims-controversial-biblical-scholar-8870879.html
The question is:
IS JESUS DIVUS JULIUS?
(IS JESUS THE HISTORICAL FIGURE OF DIVUS JULIUS, THE GOD TO WHICH JULIUS CAESAR WAS ELEVATED?)Framework of the argumentation:
A) ICONOGRAPHY OF CAESAR DO NOT FIT OUR IDEA OF HIM.
…
B) JESUS’ LIFE IS CONGRUENT TO THE LIFE OF CAESAR.
…
C) PEOPLE IN THE STORIES OF CAESAR AND OF JESUS ARE STRUCTURALLY THE SAME PEOPLE, EVEN BY NAME AND LOCATION:
…
D) CAESAR’S MOST FAMOUS QUOTATIONS ARE FOUND IN THE GOSPELS – IN STRUCTURALLY SIGNIFICANT PLACES.
…
E) THE EASTER LITURGY DOES NOT FOLLOW THE GOSPEL, BUT THE BURIAL RITUAL OF CAESAR (as Ethelbert Stauffer proved, cf. Jerusalem und Rom im Zeitalter Jesu Christi, Bern 1957, p. 21).
…
THE CULT SURROUNDING JESUS IS ACTUALLY THE CULT OF DIVUS JULIUS,
[ Extract from the book ‘Jesus was Caesar’, p. 325-329 ]
MODIFIED OVER THE COURSE OF CENTURIES IN VETERAN COLONIES IN THE EASTERN PART OF THE EMPIRE.SUMMATION: The protoevangelium seems to be the historiae of Asinius Pollio, which were not only the basis for the works of future historians (particularly Appian and Plutarch), but also the basis for liturgical texts used throughout the entire empire in the caesarea, the temples of Divus Julius.
This popular version, anchored in the daily and religious life of the people, was transformed by the cult and changed during the copying and translation process – traduttore traditore – and eventually became our Gospel. The fact that the Church always claimed that St. Mark’s Gospel was written in Latin, in Rome twelve years after the Lord departed is confirmed in an impressive way.
RESULT: The century long debate as to whether the Gospels are history or literature, a product of tradition or editing, is traced back to objective and verifiable proofs and proven. The question as to whether Jesus was actually a historical figure is also solved: Jesus is the historically transmitted figure of Divus Julius.
https://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/esumma.htm
Jesus was Caesar
The thesis of Carotta’s book Jesus was Caesar is based on a comparison of the gospels, especially the earliest, the Gospel of Mark, with the ancient sources about the last years in the life of Caesar and his immediate legacy. Roman sources include Appian, Plutarch, and Suetonius, who all relied to some extent on Caesar’s contemporary Gaius Asinius Pollio and his lost Historiae, which according to Carotta might constitute the “Latin Ur-Gospel”. This is augmented by comparisons from archaeology, numismatics, iconography, liturgy, and ritual traditions. Carotta argues that the multiple parallels he sees between the lives and cults of Caesar and Jesus can best be explained by his theory that Jesus is based on the deified Caesar, transformed and mirrored in the eastern Hellenistic and judaizing regions of the Roman Empire.
Within Carotta’s theory the gospels are hypertexts after a diegetic transposition[7] of Latin and Greek Roman sources (hypotexts) on Caesar’s life from the beginning of the civil war, the crossing of the Rubicon, his assassination, funeral, and deification, conforming to Jesus’s mission from the Jordan to his arrest, crucifixion, and resurrection. Textually transformed from Rome to Jerusalem in Caesar’s eastern veteran colonies, the Gospel narrative with its altered geography, dramatic structure, its characters and newly adopted cultural environment, would therefore have been written neither as a mimetic approximation of Caesarian attributes nor as a mythological amalgam, but as a directly dependent, albeit mutated rewriting (réécriture) of actual history.
He argues that, following this initial transposition, there was at first a redaction of the Caesarian Ur-Gospel inspired by Augustan history and theogony, whereby the later synoptic gospels by Matthew and Luke incorporated (among other pericopes) the Nativity of Jesus, originally transposed from the nativity of Augustus, and the resurrection narrative, according to the chronological-biographical structures in the historical account by Nicolaus of Damascus. Later generations produced more discrete traditions like the Gospel of John, the Acts of the Apostles, and the Book of Revelation. According to Carotta, the ultimate early Christian metamorphosis of the eastern Caesar religion, which was to reinterpret the foundational cult of the Julian imperial dynasty with regard to the contested Palestine, was provoked by the new Flavian theopolitical ideology, which also induced the rewriting of the vita of Vespasian‘s court historian Flavius Josephus into the hagiography of Saint Paul in the second part of Acts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francesco_Carotta
Te ideologię zastąpiłbym wiedzą psychopatologiczną w ujęciu makrosocjalnym czyli ponerologią.